Wednesday, October 25, 2017

Extraterrestrial Evolution

What can the Earth’s history tell us about the probability of life on other planets?

Sorry, this is not an article about finding alien fossils next to dinosaurs, or alien portals hidden within the great pyramids of Egypt.  However there are conclusions we can draw from Earth’s history that may help us estimate the probability of life existing on similar, nearby (relatively) planets. 

[Note: In the course of this short piece I will reference a variety of statistics, all of which will have been severely rounded for the sake of keeping the math simple.  Further, rounding the calculations is necessary to remove the implications of accuracy that more precise figures might suggest.]

Let’s start at the beginning – the beginning of Earth anyway.  That was around 4.3 billion years ago.  Scientists tell us that life made its first appearance on earth around 4 billion years ago, and, in spite of seven mass extinctions, life on Earth has been constant since it began.  Life has been constant on Earth for the entire time Earth had conditions to support life (assuming those first 300 million years where ‘formative,’ where Earth’s conditions were inhospitable to life.) 

Life is not rare.  It is the conditions necessary to sustain life that are rare.  If the conditions necessary for life are present, then life will be present.  Therefore we will assume a 100% probability that if a planet contains the conditions necessary for life, then life will be present.

What about ‘intelligent’ life?  Let’s define intelligent life as Australopithecus (an early humanoid capable of using tools), or ‘Lucy’ as one such skeleton is known.  Lucy appeared around 4 million years ago.  Using Earth as our guide, the probability of finding intelligent life on a planet with the conditions necessary for life, is 4,000,000 / 4,000,000,000, or approximately 1/1,000.  We can roughly estimate that one out of a thousand planets that contain life will contain intelligent life (assuming evolution would progress at roughly the same pace, and the average number of extinctions would be similar).

What about modern civilizations?  If we define modern civilizations as the beginning of the Bronze Age, then civilizations began on Earth around 4,000 years ago.  The probability that a planet containing the conditions necessary for life will have civilizations is approximately 4,000 / 4,000,000,000, or one in one million.  This sounds low, but there are trillions (more than that, actually) of stars and planets to select from, therefore there are probably thousands of civilizations within our galaxy.  Unfortunately most of these are so far away that communication with these planets using light would take longer than the expected lifetime of our civilization.


What about the closest stars?  If we consider 50 light years as a reasonable communication window, we have found approximately 100 stars similar to our sun within range of Earth.  If these stars have on average one planet with the conditions necessary for life, then the probability of a civilization existing within 50 light years of Earth is approximately 100 / 1,000,000, or one in ten thousand.

The idea that life on a distant planet would evolve in a manner similar to Earth is bound to make some people scoff.  They will argue that our evolutionary path has been influenced by a variety of random occurrences, therefore the progress on another planet will probably be significantly different.  It’s true that I’m using earth as both the median and mean of a group with a sample size of one.  Based on this, I am assuming that the characteristics of Earth represent the most probable outcome on the bell curve of possible variants.

For example, I’m assuming a planet similarly situated as Earth (nature of its star, distance from its star, etc.) would be predisposed to look like Earth in many respects (size, temperature, atmosphere) because these attributes are partially derived from its situation.  Certainly if we collected data on 100 planets all orbiting similar stars at a similar distance there would be variations in the results, however it is my contention that Earth’s characteristics are at the mean, first because it is the most probable answer, and second because we have no reason to believe otherwise (that Earth is an outlier).

If the local star is similar to our sun in size, type, and age, then the distribution of planets will also be similar, with its own ‘goldilocks zone’ ideal for sustaining life.  Further, the elemental make-up of Earth is not unusual; our planet is composed of the most popular elements in the universe and in roughly equal portions.  Therefore the composition of the typical planet in Earth’s size range and solar situation would be similar.  Each planet would probably have tectonic plates, volcanic activity, mountains, water, and atmosphere.  Each planet will probably develop vegetation of all types, and millions of varieties of species that compete to survive, evolve, and fall extinct.

Consider the impact ‘random’ events have had on the evolution of life on Earth.  The Earth’s planetary history is full of cataclysmic events such as giant asteroid strikes and volcanic eruptions that have shaped its evolutionary path.  However, over the course of 4 billion years, these events are not ‘random’ at all, but regular.  Comets will strike at a given frequency; not with the precision of your Swiss watch certainly but the longer the time horizon becomes, the more predictable the number of cataclysmic events becomes.  The same holds true with volcanoes and resulting temperature swings.  Similarly situated planets will, over a given space of time, will have a similar number of cataclysmic events of various types, all having similar extinction impacts on their various species. 

Two planets 50 light years apart that are similar in size, situation, and age may have very similar evolutionary outcomes.  One planet may develop civilizations at 3 billion years old and another at 4.  It is also probable that the other planets ‘people’ will look very similar to us.  We’re evolution’s best design for this environment, and Mother Nature has had millions of tries to get it right.  If the environment is similar, the creatures inhabiting it will be as well.

I don’t expect they’ll speak English.


4 comments:

  1. Let's pre-suppose for the sake of discussion that alien intelligence has discovered us somehow. What would they want? Our resources? Most of the elements and compounds here aren't that rare in the universe, our elemental composition roughly equals the composition of the universe itself.

    Would they want our rare habitat? Possibly, but again, as demonstrated above what is genuinely 'rare' about Earth isn't its habitat, but the flower of that habitat... us. Intelligent life that has developed into civilizations is what is extremely rare in the universe.

    Again, using Earth as the example, if we were discovered by another intelligent being, it would more likely be an AI that could probe the universe for hundreds or thousands of years without the limitations of an organic life form. An AI would have little value for our habitat because they would not need it for their own survival.

    But they would study it, and us. They would observe us, listen to us, and document our advancement. They would probably go to great efforts not to interfere with that development for fear of tainting the water. We could be their "Truman Show."

    So it's possible that the things some people have seen could be observers from outer space, but I would seriously bet against it. If they can travel this far, they can most likely observe us without discovery, unless they needed samples of... something. Even then, I would speculate that the operations of any local 'ships' where AI not organic.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Somewhere across the galaxy, probably long ago, there was a planet ideally situated for hosting life. Life flourished on this planet in spite of many cataclysmic events and mass extinctions. Intelligent life developed, civilizations grew, and eventually AI was created, which ultimately became a new species when it could propagate and sustain itself without organic support.

    The AI’s migrated into space exploration, creating space stations, and a variety of off world outposts. Eventually conditions on the original host planet worsened, and the biological species that spawned the AI died out when their planet was no longer hospitable to life. Small colonies escaped the planet but too few to advance the species back to a growing population, and eventually they were completely gone. The AI they created however continues to explore and document the universe, continuously reaching further out.

    Given the number of planets in our galaxy now and in the past that have been capable of sustaining life, this has invariably happened many times over. Therefore, it is a near certainty that multiple versions of Artificial Intelligence are probing the galaxy at this moment.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The term planetary 'situation' must certainly include moon similarity and solar system similarity. However our star's type and age, and our distance from it may prove that having a moon in our location is probable, as well as having large planets on the outside of the solar system. Both of these conditions have a great impact on the frequency of meteor strikes, a cataclysmic event that can interrupt evolution or make a planet inhospitable to life.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Why are the Earth's characteristics "the most probable answer," as I stated above? Because it is the only data we have at this point. Imagine a large jar full of marbles. You cannot see the marbles inside. If you reach in and pull out one, and it is blue. Until you pull out another marble, statistical probability dictates that the majority of all marbles in the jar are blue. Our current dataset includes only one marble at this point.

    ReplyDelete